bpchesney.org

On Friday, the Bureau of Economic Analysis announced that the GDP rose 5.7% from the third quarter to the fourth quarter of last year, exceeding expectations of 4.5% growth.  Since job growth is generally a lagging economic indicator, this is good news for those seeking jobs.  Historically, as GDP goes up, the unemployment rate goes down (not vice versa).  OpenCRS, a website that makes Congressional reports available to everyone, released an excellent report last November titled Unemployment and Economic Recovery, prepared by Brian Cashell, explaining this relationship, known as Okun’s Law.

The CRS report has a graph of unemployment rate (plotted as the dependent variable) vs. economic growth rate (as the independent variable, usually measured as GDP) over the past 60 years.

According to the historical data, GDP growth of 5.7% correlates well with a decrease in the unemployment rate (approximately 0.5%).  The current (December 2009), seasonally-adjusted unemployment rate is 10.0%, according to the Bureau of Labor and Statistics.  As a side note, Google has a slick public data initiative that can pull and plot historical data made publicly available. Below is a graph of the percentage of the total workforce that is unemployed from 1990 – 2009 (not seasonally-adjusted). Click on the “Explore Data” link to view state-by-state data.

So will the next update from the Bureau of Labor and Statistics show the unemployment rate has fallen below 10.0%?  Probably not.  According to tweets from the writers of the 538 blog, some of this growth was due to one time government spending.

So if the real GDP growth for the 4th quarter of 2009 was 2.9%, then were probably still looking at a slight increase in the unemployment rate — the break even point is about 3.5%.  However, it could mean that things are headed in the right direction.  A few quarters of 4 – 4.5% growth could bring the unemployment rate down a full percentage point, which would at least start to feel like a recovery.

The 5 states with the lowest unemployment rates for April 2009 were also in the top 10 in farm acreage in 2007 (the latest year for which the US Census Bureau has data online).

Three of the top 5 states for total farm acreage, Texas, Montana and New Mexico, are in the top 5 of total acreage as well, whereas North Dakota, South Dakota, Nebraska and Iowa are all in the top 16-20 for total acreage.  So states that have devoted a higher percentage of their land to farms have a lower unemployment rate.  

In 4 of the top 5 states for low unemployment, North and South Dakota, Nebraska and Iowa, farm land occupies about 0.09% of total acreage for the state.  In Texas, Montana and New Mexico, farm land is about 0.06 – 0.075 % of state acreage.  These three states, however, only had unemployment rates of 6.6, 6.0. and 5.8, respectively, which is still much less than the national average of 9.5%.

Two things struck me about this WSJ article about the strain on food banks in the Detroit metro area:

1. The unemployment rate in Detroit is 14.1% — the worst in the nation
2. “It’s like absolute failure,” Ms. Marsh said of the experience [of going to a food bank for the first time]. “I don’t anticipate getting comfortable doing this at any point. It’s just not in my blood.”

With unemployment this high and people clearly not able to tolerate it — what’s going to happen?  If they’re not finding employment through traditional means, which means will they find?